The company prosecutor of the on line casino chain Dreams Carlos Silvaquestioned the whole ignorance concerning the operation of on-line gaming platforms in Chile. “They do not have a domicile in the country, it does not appear who they are“, he assured, endorsing Dreams to look earlier than the East Metropolitan Prosecutor’s Office for unlawful exploitation of video games of likelihood by Betson.
It must be remembered that on Friday, March 4, Dreams filed a criticism with the Justice for unlawful exploitation of on-line betting by Betsson. “In the case of on line casino video games, the regulation is tremendous strict and says that It may be performed by those that have a license granted by the State. And it does so as a result of betting video games are regulated to ensure sure issues, for instance, public religion, that the one that bets will not be cheated and the prizes are paid. What is across the sport can be regulated, reminiscent of playing and defending kids. We know what occurs on these platforms,” mentioned Silva as company lawyer for Dreams.
The govt confused that this generates a number of concern, as a result of it’s unknown who’re the individuals behind these platforms. “They should not have a domicile in Chile, it doesn’t seem who they’re. We should not have entry to that, so in all probability this info may be collected by the Public Ministry, “he mentioned on this system Pauta de Negocios, on Radio Pauta.
The lawyer additionally claims that the casinos are “regulated by the Financial Analysis Unit (UAF) because, worldwide, it is known and there is much evidence that games of chance can lend themselves to money laundering […] These platforms do not have the obligation to report suspicious situations to the UAF“.
He added that casinos “historically in Chile have been seen as a way to generate tourist development poles,” and that the tax that’s collected goes to the municipalities and regional governments. “All of that is left out when unregulated online gaming is operated.” , he emphasizes.
“One complies with the law, tries to do things well, submits to all things very well in the sense that we are happy to do so, because we do not want to develop an illicit business. And suddenly, you find yourself with others who are doing things illegally, and you feel a little cheated because he expects the State to protect him from those things, “mentioned the lawyer.
Regarding the powers that the authorities have on this sort of matter, Silva maintains that “The Casino Law expressly states that the authority must take action when it becomes aware of the exploitation of casino games by means other than those established by law. […] To date, what we have known is that when the authority becomes aware, it refers it to the Public Ministry. We think you can do a little more“, he claimed.
Silva commented that, with the criticism, they hope “that other interested parties can take action, provide more information and, eventually, see if there are other platforms that are in the same situation.”
Meanwhile, he mentioned shall be attentive to what occurs with the invoice that entered Congress in early March to manage on-line playing.
“There have been legislative attempts, the latter was presented by the outgoing government. Unfortunately, it was presented at the very last minute, and they are not possible to be accompanied by the person who presented the bill. […] And it stays there, we don’t know what’s going to happen. We do not know if the current government is going to be interested in giving it urgency, in supporting it“, he commented.